<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sociology of corruption &#8211; the dilemmas of captive minds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taraqee.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/sociology-of-corruption-the-dilemmas-of-captive-minds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taraqee.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/sociology-of-corruption-the-dilemmas-of-captive-minds/</link>
	<description>Of Development and its Dysfunctions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PAUL NELSON</title>
		<link>http://taraqee.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/sociology-of-corruption-the-dilemmas-of-captive-minds/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>PAUL NELSON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraqee.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-338</guid>
		<description>I want to say that a lot of works have gone into corruption as a social problem. but i think the bulk of the work is in the court of sociologist.so i think we should start going back to the basis which is the family. the structure and function of the family in our contemporary society is nothing to write home about. the real values of the society need to be taught.this is definitely a long term process of reducing corruption both in developed and developing societies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to say that a lot of works have gone into corruption as a social problem. but i think the bulk of the work is in the court of sociologist.so i think we should start going back to the basis which is the family. the structure and function of the family in our contemporary society is nothing to write home about. the real values of the society need to be taught.this is definitely a long term process of reducing corruption both in developed and developing societies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raza Rumi</title>
		<link>http://taraqee.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/sociology-of-corruption-the-dilemmas-of-captive-minds/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Raza Rumi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraqee.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Well said. I think we need to make a distinction between IFI-led research and independent research. The former emanates for the purposes of an organisation while the latter is meant to promote investigation into various branches of knowledge.

The fundamental issue in this paper relates to how we &#039;view&#039; corruption and how is it handled. It is a symptomatic of many other factors...

best regards, Raza</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I think we need to make a distinction between IFI-led research and independent research. The former emanates for the purposes of an organisation while the latter is meant to promote investigation into various branches of knowledge.</p>
<p>The fundamental issue in this paper relates to how we &#8216;view&#8217; corruption and how is it handled. It is a symptomatic of many other factors&#8230;</p>
<p>best regards, Raza</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vitaliy</title>
		<link>http://taraqee.wordpress.com/2008/07/09/sociology-of-corruption-the-dilemmas-of-captive-minds/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitaliy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taraqee.wordpress.com/?p=161#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Sounds like something worthwhile to read.  I don&#039;t know if I agree with the statement that economists&#039; treat corruption as a &quot;peripheral subject.&quot;  

To my understanding, economists have produced large quantities of research on corruption (commissioned by the IMF and WB); initially at least, the study of corruption was definitely more popular in economics than in political science.  

Today however, political scientists are neck-in-neck with the economists, and arguably ahead.  If any one discipline treats corruption peripherally, then Sociology is it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like something worthwhile to read.  I don&#8217;t know if I agree with the statement that economists&#8217; treat corruption as a &#8220;peripheral subject.&#8221;  </p>
<p>To my understanding, economists have produced large quantities of research on corruption (commissioned by the IMF and WB); initially at least, the study of corruption was definitely more popular in economics than in political science.  </p>
<p>Today however, political scientists are neck-in-neck with the economists, and arguably ahead.  If any one discipline treats corruption peripherally, then Sociology is it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
